On the other hand, Speech is also important because the correct use of speech is
required for the correct use of reason, the chief asset of speech being the precision
it enables: ‘Seeing then that
truth consisteth in the right ordering of names in our
affirmations, a man that seeketh precise
truth, had need to remember what every
name he uses stands for; and to place it accordingly; or else he will find himselfe
entangled in words, as a bird in lime-twiggs.’ Speech’s primary use, according
to Hobbes, is to verbalize our thoughts. The utility of mental discourse being to
fulfill one’s desires, the utility of speech is also to fulfill one’s desires, but now
with precision. Speech amounts to the correct use of names and the relations
between them. Hobbes insists that words joined together properly constitute truth;
improperly, falsity. Thus he states that truth and falsity are properties of speech,
not of objects themselves. Hobbes’ materialist starting point leads him to discuss
speech and reason as if they were quantitative processes consisting in mathematical
relations between individual thoughts: ‘
Subject to Names, is whatsoever can enter
into, or be considered in an account; and be added one to another to make a summe;
or subtracted one from another, and leave a remainder’ (Hobbes, pp. 105–).
Names are the individual components of speech, corresponding to individual
thoughts; therefore human beings require education regarding definitions and
names, the correct use of speech being ‘the Acquisition of Science’. For Hobbes,
understanding occurs when a person hears words and as a result has the thoughts to
which those words and their connections correspond. Understanding, for Hobbes,
is caused by speech.
A quantitative process underlies Hobbes’ conception of reason as well. Reason
is the ‘adding’ and ‘subtracting’ of the thoughts implied by the significance of
the names and words employed. While reason is not a source of certainty, it must
begin with precise, unambiguous definitions and follow a clear method if it is to
lead to science. Absurdity is the result of a lack of method and of the improper use
of names. Properly educated, he writes, ‘all men by nature reason alike, and well,
when they have good principles’. These principles are the apt naming of objects
and the proper method of connecting names together, leading to assertions. The
correct connection of assertions, in turn, leads to syllogisms, ‘till we come to a